<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disputed history of the term Business Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/</link>
	<description>History of software, by somebody who lived it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:36:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The phrase &#8220;business intelligence&#8221; was COINED for text analytics &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-28501</link>
		<dc:creator>The phrase &#8220;business intelligence&#8221; was COINED for text analytics &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-28501</guid>
		<description>[...] last year, there was a little flap about who invented the phrase business intelligence. Credit turns out to go to an IBM researcher named H. P. Luhn, as per this 1958 paper. Well, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last year, there was a little flap about who invented the phrase business intelligence. Credit turns out to go to an IBM researcher named H. P. Luhn, as per this 1958 paper. Well, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-20240</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-20240</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob!

You might have been able to save yourself a bit of trouble with a web search. But no problem from my end -- I&#039;m glad to share the name &quot;Monash&quot; with you guys down under, given that Sir John is the most distinguished member of my family and all.  (One small grumble -- he really shouldn&#039;t have taken to pronouncing the name with a short &quot;o&quot;.  A long one is more in keeping with his, and my, ancestry. :) )  I do get a few email intended for monash.edu from time to time, of course ...

As for re-invention or whatever -- where any of those articles particularly well-circulated and/or recent to the late 1980s?

Best,

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob!</p>
<p>You might have been able to save yourself a bit of trouble with a web search. But no problem from my end &#8212; I&#8217;m glad to share the name &#8220;Monash&#8221; with you guys down under, given that Sir John is the most distinguished member of my family and all.  (One small grumble &#8212; he really shouldn&#8217;t have taken to pronouncing the name with a short &#8220;o&#8221;.  A long one is more in keeping with his, and my, ancestry. <img src='http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )  I do get a few email intended for monash.edu from time to time, of course &#8230;</p>
<p>As for re-invention or whatever &#8212; where any of those articles particularly well-circulated and/or recent to the late 1980s?</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-20142</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwarememories.com/2007/12/02/disputed-history-of-the-term-business-intelligence/#comment-20142</guid>
		<description>Hi Curt,

Yes, the whole &#039;Monash&#039; thing is confusing!  It took me a while to work out why people were referring to me as Curt. Hopefully it hasn&#039;t caused you too much grief!  If I&#039;d known at the time, I&#039;d have called the blog something else.

According to one of my colleagues here at Monash University, the term was kicking around especially in the 1980s.  There was a moderately well known, mid-tier consulting company, I think in the UK, that called themselves Business Intelligence, for example.  In fact, in a follow up comment to the post you linked to, there&#039;s some stats showing the term being used in at least 162 indexed articles prior to 1989 when Howard Dresner claims he came up with the term.

Obviously it&#039;s exploded since then, so I can comfortably accept a claim of popularising the term, but actually (re-)inventing it is a bit of a stretch.  Maybe it was a subliminal thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Curt,</p>
<p>Yes, the whole &#8216;Monash&#8217; thing is confusing!  It took me a while to work out why people were referring to me as Curt. Hopefully it hasn&#8217;t caused you too much grief!  If I&#8217;d known at the time, I&#8217;d have called the blog something else.</p>
<p>According to one of my colleagues here at Monash University, the term was kicking around especially in the 1980s.  There was a moderately well known, mid-tier consulting company, I think in the UK, that called themselves Business Intelligence, for example.  In fact, in a follow up comment to the post you linked to, there&#8217;s some stats showing the term being used in at least 162 indexed articles prior to 1989 when Howard Dresner claims he came up with the term.</p>
<p>Obviously it&#8217;s exploded since then, so I can comfortably accept a claim of popularising the term, but actually (re-)inventing it is a bit of a stretch.  Maybe it was a subliminal thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
